Career growth in the research space is not straight-forward. It has been described, in previous mentorship sessions, as a marathon rather than a sprint. One has to first obtain relevant disciplinary skills and knowledge to join the field, then continue being abreast with what’s going on in their field of interest – for professional growth and development.

Recently, I found myself contemplating how strategic PhD milestones should look like. This goes beyond the academic component, where one is expected to have acquired advanced-level knowledge and skills. It’s a reflection into what, under ideal circumstances, needs to happen to strategically position self for continued professional growth. Here is what came to my mind:

First year

The first year would for ensuring strong and adequeate project preparation. A well done literature review chapter and clear methodology would have been accomplished by end of the first year. If possible, publishing one or two research articles based on documentary research and development of theory would be a significant milestone.

Second year

Much of empirical work would go in to the second year. It may be possible to prepare a publication based on preliminary findings. However, strategic progress in the second year might involve exploring funding opportunities. This is not necessarily big grants; small applications for support e.g., to attend conferences and workshops. Captured in the curriculum vitae, it would showcase practical experience in applying and winning grants

Third year

The third year would be a year to finalise empirical data collection, prepare thesis and additional manuscripts where possible. A strategic move in the third year would entail exploring the possibility of teaching – especially if one sees themselves as a potential professor in future days.

Fourth year

For those that are unable to finish their PhD in three years, the fourth year could be seen as a contingency period. Especially for a complex project with multiple players and many steps in the critical pathway. This may apply more to the social sciences than ‘hard sciences’ such as laboratory-based research

One needs to think beyond the daily happenings and think of strategic moves that would position them well for the postdoctoral period. Being strategic could be likened to an acrobat throwing multiple balls into the air; the acrobat needs to know what ball to throw, what ball to catch next, and how many balls they can handle for a stunning performance.

Lead your life to reach your goals, live deliberately